This escalated quickly..................
If you don't mind, I will share my suggestions:
1) About tenders.
I think that we must distinguish 2 different cases:
The first case is, when a new or inexperienced player requests some advices or resources for tendering. Honestly, I think that in this case, the player who gives advice or provides resources should not expect any compensation for the action. In this case, the aim is to help the smaller players to develop, not to see tenders as an investment
The secondcase is when 2 experienced players get together to win some tenders. In this case the aim of the cooperation is clearly to earn profit, therefor all prizes should be equally divided, or divided in a way they agreed between each other.
2) About contests.
If someone is helping a new player in wining the contest, the new player may give a little part of the prize to the player who helped him. For example, I helped a player with advices and resources during a contest for president, he finished 2nd or 3rd, and he gave me 1 VIRT in exchange. Not to much, but I think it was fair, because my aim was not to earn profit, but to help others.
Also I think that the Corporation should not interviene or regulate tendering and the division of prizes. However what must be done, that new players or the participants of the contest for presidents must be prioritized. So the new player or the participant of the CoP should write a message that he is trying a tender, so noone else should compete with him/her.
In my opinion, apart form helping new players the aim of the Corporation should be to improve each others business opportunities by providing surplus scarce resources on dicounted prices to each other, whcih the producer can not use efficiently. For example, I have a high qulity grain farm, but I am not intrested in producing food or livestock (except bees), so I sell all my quality 10 grain for $ 1 per unit. |