Mike1
guess its a technical issue where the administration didn't want to add extra code to separate pre/post change functionality.
pre/post change functionality is what i am referring to. for changes to be fair, the change itself should come into effect
1) with prior notice
2) only after the notice is given.
for tender 555, i registered and started work on that BEFORE the announcement (as some others have for their tenders)
when the announcement was made, i sought clarification but received none
and yes, i don't want to just let it go because i have entered many tenders and this is only my 2nd win. i do not honestly believe i will win many more, at least until my quality of supplies improve significantly. so, THIS win matters to me, as does the work i have put in for it. if i lost, i WILL, and do, live with it.
this is not just a whine about not getting virts. it is similar to LUC07's eventual VIRT credit. the rules then were not clear that franchised items did not count, and LUC07's win was honoured. the rule now in question is registration of the tenders before the tender change is supposed to take effect. THAT is certainly not clear, nor do i think is fair to be interpreted this way.
it would be more fair for me and others in the same situation to have the win(s) honoured.
as for the 2nd issue, i would have thought it is technically EASIER to just have the check on registration. if player is in the correct league upon registration, player can play and win. that will ALSO, in my books, be more fair because most of us do need to work for the tender(s). to be able to register, do work on the tender, then to win and not get the virts because of another win is NOT fair - it is also not helpful for players who wish to spend some virts in between tenders.
the point of the virts and tenders, apart from revenue for the company, i thought was to raise player interests. having the rules such that players will not 'dare' to spend the VIRTs in between tenders is not logical. |