Create your dream company in the global economy game!

Play Business Game!
Русский Українська Español Deutsch
Login Password Sign Up / Login Forgot your password? English
Search
virtonomica

List of forums -> Main forum of the online business game "Virtonomics" -> How bold will Virtonmics go?

Discussions on our virtual business game, your ideas and game mechanics

Topic:

Topic created : 23.10.2010, 03:57

austenbosten
Three years with Virtonomics
 
Basically that is my question administrators. You have created a game that is litterally a virtual economy. It teaches good skills in basic business. It allows people who desire to be the Rockefellers, the Carnagies, the Morgans, the Rothschilds, the Fords ect. To Do Just That!
 
Basically when you look at it, Virtonomics should be a very boring game (many people wouldn't get excited taking a business course) however you have made it not only realistic to a degree (there is a real economy at work, Supply&Demand) but fun.
 
So on to my question, how bold do the creators plan to go?
 
-Will we see the allowance of a banking and financial (stock market) industry? (oh how I hope!)
-Will we see the Service Sector industry be created?
-Will we see more in-depth taxation system? (I think it would be neat to have players who are Vitronomics tax accountants, but it may be too bold and complex)
-Will we see a North American market (US, Canada, Mexico)
-Will we see a macro-management system (Basically end the mundane, micro-tinkering with Retail Stores)
-Will we see a more complex government system (Like some nations [Turkey, African nations, ect.] are more socialist [higher taxation and regulation regarding trusts and market jobbing] that will affect where players do business?)
 
I know some sound good and others sound too complex or unnecessary, but I am interested in what the Admin's goals with Virtonomics are, because this game is really great and has so much potential!   

  • Page:
  • 1
Message list:  

23.10.2010, 09:28

Santa Claus hat The winner of the Storm of regions nomination of the Industry Competition Winner of the Leaders Contest in the nomination Quality label Winner of the Leaders Contest in the nomination of Consumer Goods Winner of the Leaders Contest in the nomination The Standard of Virtonomics Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Raw Material Base Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Consumer Goods Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Trade Turnover
Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination The Standard of Virtonomics Three years with Virtonomics
 
You can expect stock market to appear next year, where all companies with asset over $100 bil can issue shares up to 25% of the company value to finance its operation.  Hopefully, all the smaller companies will buy them as a long-term investment. 
 

23.10.2010, 22:32

austenbosten
Three years with Virtonomics
 
really, that sounds like the opposite of a stock market. Stock markets are a vehicle for companies to raise cash by selling shares of ownership. It is really designed for the smaller companies to gather capital to expand instead of getting loans, the only reason large-cap companies would go public, is if they are desperately short of cash (either overextended or the business is faulty and they need the capital to reinvigorate the company). It would make more since to set the bar lower on who can go public, perhaps companies with assets more than $1 billion.
 
Investors will not make money on such a large company, since the ability for that company to expand will be weaker than that of a smaller company, or worse the larger company is more likely to downsize due to a recession, which would kill shareholders investments. I don't want to sound like a whiner, but if that's what Virtonomics plans for a stock market, there might as well not be one.
 
I understand that the Admins might fear that newer players raising too much capital too early will deter them from playing long-term. However small companies buying "blue-chips" will make little or no money on stock appreciation, therefore they will not spend the cash on stocks from companies that expand poorly compared to $1b>$10b companies, so the stock market feature will be purely novelty and will have terrible participation from players if they see little gain. (Basically players would rather open a retail store and make a couple of million in a few weeks, than buy stocks in a company that will hardly appreciate) In RL people only buy "blue-chips" for stability and security reasons, they never buy them for capital appreciation.
 
So what I propose the admins should do, is either lower the restrictions to companies issuing stocks to at least $1b>$10b or if the Admins want to only allow $100b companies to issue securities, get rid of the stock market and create a bond market.
 
There large-cap companies can issue bonds, and small players are guaranteed at least a stable income. Therefore with a bond market, small-cap players will be more likely to purchase bonds rather than stock.
 
I don't mean to dictate, but I see a lot of potential with the stock market and too see it restricted to only large-cap companies would just make the feature pointless.
 
Also if you are creating a stock market/bond market, will we see a Capital Gains Tax?
 

Thanks 
 

List of forums -> Main forum of the online business game "Virtonomics"-> How bold will Virtonmics go?

  • Page:
  • 1