Sulaco,
ever wondered why so many want to flee from your Hungarian refugee camps? May be the treatment they received there was not as an human being expects. Some Report indicate this and situations like letting hundreds of refugees wait in a train at 30 C without being allowed to leave it for hours without having enough to drink doesn't sound like the right treatment, as well. I don't know if it happened because of overstrained authorities (would be understandable regarding the masses of refugees), bad organisation or by intention. I hope not for the latter, since I always enjoyed my stays in Hungary and would like to continue to love the people there.
What does it prove, that 80% of the refugees are young man (I don't know if your number is correct, but I don't have a better one)? Who would risk going on an overfilled boat over the sea or hundreds of kilometers by foot through foreign countries? I assume mostly young man, some with their families, some without. I expect most of the Syrian retirees would not be able to afford paying traffickers and withstand the circumstances of such a journey. Regarding the refugees who arrived here in Munich, there quite a lot of families amound them.
I totaly disagree with your opinion about the illegality of the refugees. Even if they moved on from a neighbour country of Syria on towards mid Europe, they are still refugees to me. I know the law would allow the European countries to send them back to the first save country they have reached. But how should this work? Have you checked the situation in the neighbour countries? Last numbers I heard was, that there are already 1.6 million Syrians in Turkey, more than 1 million in Libanon (about 20% of it's population!). If such not that rich countries can help so many, why shouldn't Europe be able to help those few hundred thousands who made it here?
And btw, to me no-one IS illegal. One might be in a country without a official permission, but he still is a human being and sould be treated like this and not called being illegal.
What is interesting in these videos? We don't have any information about the situation there. What the refugees might have been promised and not hold before or whatever. It just shows some angry (first) and desperate (second) refugees who were running out of passion for reasons we don't know. And even if could understand the comments in it, I realized the second one is from Russian Television, everything else than an unbiased free journalist media company.
Unacceptable to me is your explanation for your hate against muslims. You say it is so, because other muslims have occupied your capital some hundreds of years ago? What a silly reason. Just look at the European history. Almost anyone in Europe would have to hate several other states because of that. So many occupations, so many wars for such a long time. But now we are building this house called Europe to get over all this old stuff. We, who are living today, have to live together in peace and good neighbourhood and over all, this worked not too bad since WWII. If you care so much about what had happened in the past, what do you think, how many should hate how many others for what fromer generations had done?
Btw, if we Europeans will not be able to continue this great idea of Europe, then we might be the refugees in a few decades.
> Honestly, I woul prefer that our governments would dopr bombs on the jihadist instead of spend that on the refugees.
If this would be possible, I would agree. Probably even the refugees who then wouldn't have to leave their country. But how do you tell your bombs who is the jihadist and who the civilist? There are not too many examples in recent history where bombs helped to change situations to become better.
Ackermann
Munich, Germany |