|
|
|
List of forums -> FAQ -> Qualification growth. How it works |
||
| Topic: |
|
|||||||||
|
Common info
If the player qualification is fully utilized, qualification growth will be faster. That is the ideal growth factor - when the company is working with 100% efficiency and full usage of a top manager capacity. However, there are the following additional factors to effect qualification growth: management's growth is additionally evaluated by paid taxes of the company commerce's growth is additionally evaluated by profit (paid taxes) of stores. production's, mining and animal husbandry growth is evaluated by the quality of produced goods. Ideally, the company must produce high quality goods. At high levels of qualification, output quality should be equal to the average quality of the realm. For lower levels of qualification it can be lower. Optimal growth of science is evaluated by the amount of technology inventions in the previous 15 turns and the sale of technology (not license) in the previous 15 turns. agricultural growth has no additional factors; growth only happens during the harvest season. marketing's growth is evaluated by volume of advertising. Single volumes of advertising and / or the total amount of advertising must comply with the current level of player. The ideal load - this is when top1 and top3 are utilized to the maximum. ~~~ What is top1, top2, top3? To run a subdivision with full efficiency, a suitable Top Manager qualification (Q) is required. A players qualification grows every day, according to a summary of factors from all subdivisions of the respective Q. One indicator is 100% efficiency at every subdivision, but there are other "invisible" factors which effect Q growth. Those are Top1, top2 and top3. When the new qualifications system was introduced, those invisible factors Top1-3 were displayed at each subdivision for a while in a special window which looked like this: 
Top1 - How much Top Manager qualification needed to manage the current settings (current staff number and qualification) in a single subdivision Top2 - How much Top Manager qualification needed to manage the required settings (required staff number and qualification) in a single subdivision Top3 - total number of staff for the whole company ~~~ How to achive growth from this table? It's very simple - you must load your top manager at each unit and throughout the company. Ie if the load is ideal, then the hiring of another employee, reduced eff. all units of the industry. If we increase the qualifications of personnel that eff. also decreases (only in this unit) Conventionally, it can be represented as: 
Note: You can artificially increase the qualification of staff, to the maximize load of top1 Is there a caveat - top1 and top3 can compensate for each other. For example, in this case, eff. will be 100%, although top1 overloaded (because top3 underloaded): 
But, growth will not be perfect (due to lack of load on top3) Note: Overloading of top-manager are not recommended - reduce growth due to low eff. will be stronger than in case of low load. Note: Easy way to maximize load on top1 - set the total number of staff to the values from this table, and then at each enterprise increases the qualification until total efficiency starts falling ~~~ Bonuses from awards have influence to the growth? Yes and no  For growth takes value of native top, but if the load exceeds its capacity, the bonuses help to avoid reducing the efficiency, and consequently - reducing the growth will not: 
~~~ Which is better - a large subdivision, or lots of little ones? For growth of top manager - no difference. Example: Qualifications of a top manager in the production = 7. Situation 1: two units at 3500 workplaces (personnel qualification - 2) Situation 2: 10 units at 700 workplaces (personnel qualification - 6,78) In both cases, the load on top1 (for each unit) and top3 (the entire company) is the same. In the former case, less salary costs and stress of the office. In the second case - have the opportunity to put more high tech, but the load on the office are much higher. ~~~ How additional factors affect the growth? Only downward. Ie if your top1 and top3 not loaded, then additional factors will not be able to compensate for the low load. Approximate calculation of growth is as follows: 1. Determine the base growth (depending on workload top1 and top3) 2. If eff. unit is less 100%, then the base is reduced. 3. Multiplied by a coefficient of additional factors (eg, for managment and commerce can be reduced to 10 times) In best case coefficient = 1 (not reduces) ~~~ How do I know how perfect growing my skills? Install this script (originally by test01; adapted for Chrome by Ixnad) How to install user script ~~~ Special thanks to Mike1
|
|||||||||
|
| Message list: |
|
|||||||||
|
|||||
+ 6, noglues5. Thankyou very much for this   |
|||||
|
Moderator
|
|||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Q10 in management for 26 days (to win points in CM):
Don't forget to pay enough taxes management's growth is additionally evaluated by paid taxes of the company |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||
| Hi everyone, it seems that the table on maximum numbers of employees per level might be not exact, or need some changes if there are additional management efficiency add-ons being received. I have Management Q3 now, and have 100% planned efficiency for my three offices, with total number of 43 employees, each office with Q1 (employee numbers per office: 34, 5, 4).
Just wanted to warn that you should not follow the tables blindly, but test yourself! . And also the office efficiency is distributed not lineary - I had 100% in my major office, but percentages in 80s in other two - so you probably should check each office for planned efficieny if you change something in one of them. However this could also be due to my status as new player having a hired management with manager efficiency +100%, but then it's a question how all this is calculated.
Or otherwise I don't get something regarding those Top1, Top2 and Top3 boundaries. |
|||||
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||
| Hey noglues, what an awesome piece of information! Thanks!
If I understand you right, TOP1 = How much Top Manager qualification needed to manage the current settings (current staff number and qualification) TOP2 = How much Top Manager qualification needed to manage the required settings (required staff number and qualification) So in this picture, top1 is determined by 40 staff at Q6.93, top2 is determined by 22 staff at Q4.17 right? 
This is a bit different to VLLord's definition? Or Am I reading it wrong all along? V said only staff # determines top2, and there is no mention that top2 = required settings:
A clarification would be appreciated! |
|||||||
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
If I understand you right,Exactly  Top2 - it's only just background information. It was shown to help players during the transition to a new system of qualification The most helpful it was in office - it was immediately clear which of them are too loaded by subdivisions (in the old system of qualification offices have worked quite differently) This is a bit different to VLLord's definition? Or Am I reading it wrong all along? V said only staff # determines top2, and there is no mention that top2 = required settings:I think VLLord made the wrong conclusions because an update information about future eff. is delayed. Ie his chart for top1 in the case of proper collection of information should look not so:
but so:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|||||||
Hmm interesting. Thanks a bunch! 
So we can pretty much forget about top2 now and focus on top1 right? Since if you overload your top2, your efficiency will be <100% whether you have required full settings or understaffed settings...
Are the red numbers the only data that needs to be fixed? Also I always wanted to ask: Are these kind of data collected by hand or is there an empirical formula for it? (If so I'd love to see the formula ;) |
|||||||
List of forums -> FAQ-> Qualification growth. How it works | |
|
