Русский Українська Français Español Deutsch 中文
Login Password Register Forgot your password? English
Search Rating log
virtonomica

List of forums -> Main forum -> Office efficiency


Topic:

Topic created : 6 November 2011, 14:25

DeimonSalvator
Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination The Standard of Virtonomics Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Trade Turnover Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Consumer Goods Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Qualifying examinations for the Candidate's degree Winner of the Contest for Directors in the nomination Consumer Goods Winner of the Contest for Directors in the nomination Quality label
m:
DeimonSalvator International
 
I changed the size of my office to 50 places and now i cant get my office efficiency to 100%.if i put high salaries to reach the required qualification than my top manager cant support that qualification but if i put low salaries=low qualification The level of administrative load will go over 100%.what do i need to do?    

Page:
1
Message list:  

6 November 2011, 19:05.     Subject: Other variables

IQof20
Guinea retail leader
m:
Fracktastic Gas
 
I responded in your other thread, but for others encountering the same thing, look at:
 
1) # of Managers
2) Qualification of Managers
3) # of computers
4) Quality of Computers
5) Qualification in each area (My Office | Qualification)
6) Where you recently expanded
 
1-3 are fairly straightforward.  #4 is the common "first miss" IMHO but just increase the quality and see what happens.
 
#5 and #6 rather go together as this is just about understanding where you're pushing the envelope.  For example, I expanded heavily into retail early on as I found limited success in production, so my Retail Qualification expanded rapidly.  If you watch/track the growth rates then it will remind you of where your strengths are and where you're pushing the envelope.
 
Also note that expanding "high tech" early often causes you to outstretch your management capability.  Having highly skilled workers takes more skilled managers.  Early on, it is very easy to expand beyond what your managers can handle.
 
However, when discussing this stuff, I'm often reminded of the phrase that sums up my economic education.  A phrase that I constantly have to remind people of now still 20 years later:  Ceteris Paribus.  And even in the game world this is rarely something that can be achieved. 
 

6 November 2011, 21:23

DeimonSalvator
Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination The Standard of Virtonomics Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Trade Turnover Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Consumer Goods Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Qualifying examinations for the Candidate's degree Winner of the Contest for Directors in the nomination Consumer Goods Winner of the Contest for Directors in the nomination Quality label
m:
DeimonSalvator International
 
i changed the size of my office back to 10 places and now i got this results.this is driving me crazy
Main Office page
http://img577.imageshack.us/img577/2267/officel.png ...
Work efficiency page before i opened 3 new offices
http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/9238/workefficiencyoffice.png ...
I also opened 3 new offices with 10 workers and about 4.5 Q of equipment
Work efficiency page after i opened 3 new offices
http://img841.imageshack.us/img841/5458/workefficiencyofficeaft.png ...
As you see this increases the workload instead of reducing it 
 

7 November 2011, 02:22

IQof20
Guinea retail leader
m:
Fracktastic Gas
 
The size of the office was probably fine at 50 but don't fill it.  Having >13 managers in this case is necessary for the "other" workers you have elsewhere (say 15).
 
I would still believe you could benefit from better computers.  I think I settled on a level of 6 or so when I was starting after some suggestions from others.
 
Spreading the offices across multiple territories is mainly about spreading other work across locations as well.  And this definitely can lead to benefits even early on.  
 
I also should point out that trying to be *exact* with certain items (like minimum requirements, exact # of workers, etc.) can lead to you being less than 100% because the system rounds these numbers and you can still wind up under skilled or under staffed.  Plus these #'s are for the past week, not next week, so if you expand via sales in your stores for example you might require more workers leading to perpetually being <100%. 
 

7 November 2011, 02:42.     Subject: Malaga Revenue Opportunities

IQof20
Guinea retail leader
m:
Fracktastic Gas
 
Also, since you're building in Malaga it looks like, if you drop a store there then there are at least a couple of items which have easy potential for revenue w/o a large amount of work.
 
For example, the local Market for Perfume right now (open a Malaga store | Marketing | City Market) is trading at $170 per unit and quality of 5.6.  This means that if you "happen" to have perfume at that price/quality available in your store then you'll  do fairly well.  All it takes then is stock and advertising to get people into your store.  Given that StarterFund Perfumery and Toledano Trade Almacen Telodano are providing perfume around that range.  If you bought 80/20 from each of those respectively then you wind up w/ a cost of ~$104 and a quality of ~5.66 (at least currently) bringing you an easy $65/unit in profit.
 
Such situations change as others adapt their sales, but right now there is an opportunity here for fairly straightforward revenue on that particular product.
 
In other situations it is not so easy to see the potential revenue, but this is a fairly easy one. 
 

7 November 2011, 11:47

Last time edited : 7 November 2011, 11:57

Mike1
Leader in technologies Anniversary star "Two years with Virtonomics" United Arab Emirates retail leader Княжеские хоромы Astronaut helmet Hockey skates Cast-iron Weight of the Mr. Virtonomics 2011 Golden underwear
Standard bed-clothing Estonian standard coin Top Technologist
m:
Mico Inc
Valentine
New Year´s congratulations
Yachts
4
Yachts
5

For good luck!
For good luck!
Greeting card
3
Yachts
6

Study mathematics
Cake for the occasion
Respect
Golden chicken
4

 
Right now i can't view your images, it says the account is blocked? please check or post them somewhere else?
 
You can also join the skype group and we can figure it out faster,  i'll be glad to help 
 

7 November 2011, 20:01

DeimonSalvator
Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination The Standard of Virtonomics Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Trade Turnover Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Consumer Goods Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Qualifying examinations for the Candidate's degree Winner of the Contest for Directors in the nomination Consumer Goods Winner of the Contest for Directors in the nomination Quality label
m:
DeimonSalvator International
 
where can i join the skype group? 
 

8 November 2011, 06:26

Mike1
Leader in technologies Anniversary star "Two years with Virtonomics" United Arab Emirates retail leader Княжеские хоромы Astronaut helmet Hockey skates Cast-iron Weight of the Mr. Virtonomics 2011 Golden underwear
Standard bed-clothing Estonian standard coin Top Technologist
m:
Mico Inc
Valentine
New Year´s congratulations
Yachts
4
Yachts
5

For good luck!
For good luck!
Greeting card
3
Yachts
6

Study mathematics
Cake for the occasion
Respect
Golden chicken
4

 
skype: do a search in the forum for "skype"
 
efficiency problem:
 
image "workefficiencyoffice":
13 workers required, 10 available: better computers require less workers!
1. Reduce worker qualification slightly (maybe 6.9) to get Top manager efficiency to 100%.
2.  increase computer quality until the required qualification of employees is used up.
 
This may just work. if not,  remove 10-20 workers at the controlled subdivisions.
 
image "workefficiencyofficeaft"
worker qualification (and computers) are both to low here 
 

10 November 2011, 01:48

Geekrulez
Anniversary star  "One year with Virtonomics"
l:
Corponation
 
So, how about workload ?? What is the mechanism ? 
 

11 November 2011, 15:28

cool_crasher
l:
cool_crasher International
 
i did the same mistake prolly ur computer quality is too high which dont need replace computers and adjust employee salary and everything else respectively.....must make it good..... 
 

31 December 2011, 10:41

mikey153
Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination The Standard of Virtonomics Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Trade Turnover Winner of the Contest for Managers in the nomination Qualifying examinations for the Candidate's degree Estonia retail leader Lithuania retail leader
l:
mikey153 Corporation
 
I find the quality of the computer essential too. But mine does not exceed quality 4, and management is 7 now. I see that i just put one extra manager above the minimum requirement and the efficiency is 100% and load is a comfortable 50-80% range.
 
I have also experienced a situation whereby a new office needed 7 managers instead of the minimum 1 to bring down the workload to below 90%, but this was resolved when I upped the quality of the computer, and give my managers training. So I believe quality or managers and computers go hand in hand.
 
MIke 
 

List of forums -> Main forum-> Office efficiency

Page:
1
Join VirtonomicsFacebookTwitter